One of the most significant and controversial challenges, both jurisprudentially and legally, facing an Islamic government in theory and practice is the issue of corruption and misconduct by state officials, and consequently, public protests and objections. Considering the lofty objectives of an Islamic government—such as realizing religiosity in the practical sphere and responding to the legitimate expectations of the public—corruption and negligence among officials can be regarded as factors that disrupt the overall course of governmental goals as well as its legitimacy and public acceptance.

Therefore, due to the importance and practical relevance of this issue, and in light of existing legal challenges, this study examines—based on jurisprudential foundations—the scope and limits of individuals’ duty of forbidding evil (Nahy ‘an al-Munkar) with respect to corruption and misconduct by officials within a legitimate Islamic government. Furthermore, by taking into account both jurisprudential and legal principles and through careful analysis of the relevant evidence, the study identifies the deficiencies and challenges that are sometimes found in the current laws governing justice-seeking activities and public protests. Finally, through a comprehensive approach to the subject, the research proposes conclusions aimed at reforming the existing structure in this field and revising criminal laws so that the two religious duties of enjoining good and forbidding evil (Amr bil-Ma‘ruf wa Nahy ‘an al-Munkar) may also be recognized as grounds for exemption from criminal liability.